Learn

Why prop firms are closing: what changed in 2026

Tiziano Brunno · 30 October 2026 · 13 min
A house of cards made of thin glass panels collapsing next to an intact dark steel monolith with a seam of amber light, on a reflective black floor.

Hi trader,

late September 2026.

A futures prop firm that claimed to pay out around 700 thousand dollars a month announces it’s closing.

It’s called FundedSeat.

It didn’t vanish into thin air, it didn’t freeze withdrawals.

What it said, basically, was: we can’t grow because the big trading platforms won’t give us room.

Read that again.

A company that, by its own account, was paying its traders, and paying them a lot, is closing anyway.

If there’s one fact that sums up 2026 for prop firms, it’s this one.

And I’ll tell you right away how I see it, having spent years in this world, from the inside: it’s not a crisis. It’s a selection.

Let’s take it step by step.

The model that’s leaving the stage

I’ll explain it in two lines, no beating around the bush.

For years a lot of props worked like this: I sell challenges, the vast majority of customers don’t pass them, most of the revenue comes from the fees, and the payouts to the few who pass depend on that income.

All of it built on rented platforms, rented brokers, rented data.

As long as the wind is blowing your way, it works.

The problem is that when the provider changes its mind, or when a market runs in one direction and too many traders jump on it at the same time, the castle has no foundations of its own.

In 2026 this happened several times, in different ways.

Let’s look at them by category, because a flat list teaches you nothing.

1. The ones closing because they have no access to platforms

FundedSeat we’ve already seen: closure announced on 28 September, stated reason the limits imposed by the big platforms. According to Finance Magnates, active accounts are being refunded, and pending withdrawals and positive live balances paid out.

Rev One Trading closes in mid-August. The founder, Angelo Ciaramello, writes that they didn’t have a top-tier platform to offer and that this was holding back growth. He announces he’s moving to prediction markets. Not a word, in the announcement, about customers’ subscriptions and payouts.

It’s not his first prop project to run into trouble: Finance Magnates names him as the founder of The Funded Trader, which stopped in 2024 and then restarted.

And these aren’t isolated cases.

ProjectX, the technology several futures props ran on, had told third-party props the service would end by the end of February 2026, while remaining in use at Topstep (source Finance Magnates).

Spotware, the company behind cTrader, restricted the onboarding of US traders after an internal review in the first quarter, and several props removed cTrader for their US customers.

The moral?

If your prop doesn’t control the technology it has you trading on, its life depends on somebody else’s decisions.

2. The ones changing business

We’re not talking about failures here. We’re talking about companies that ran the numbers and chose something else.

Seacrest (MyFundedFX had become SeacrestFunded) on 6 February shuts down CFD prop trading to focus on brokerage, while its futures prop carries on with MyFunded Futures. Refunds on request for active, non-breached challenges and a final payout for funded traders, to be requested by 28 February.

ATFunded, the prop of broker ATFX, on 6 June pauses operations to “evaluate alternative models”, months after the CEO’s departure. It promised full refunds and payment of pending payouts. As of today I haven’t found any public confirmation that they’ve actually been paid, and no restart date.

OANDA Prop Trader isn’t a failure: FTMO bought OANDA (deal closed in December 2025), and on 2 March 2026 announces the end of the program, which wraps up on 31 March: those who move to FTMO get incentives, the others a refund where applicable.

And some are moving within the same world: at the end of September TradersYard closed its forex and CFD challenges to focus on futures.

See the thread?

The “side” prop, born to sell one more product for a broker, is the first to go when margins get tight.

3. The ones burning trust with retroactive rules

This is the case that makes me angriest.

FundingTicks, futures prop of the FundingPips group.

December 2025: in come a minimum holding time of 1 minute per position, a minimum profit for a valid trading day that rises from 150 to 200 dollars, more required days, and a split that drops from a maximum of 90% to 80%. According to Finance Magnates, traders complain that the new rules are applied to accounts that were already open too. The Trustpilot score drops from 4.1 to 3.2.

On 19 January 2026 FundingPips announces the closure of FundingTicks, calls it a “strategic decision”, and promises refunds on challenges and payouts to funded traders.

Why? Nobody said so officially.

TradeInformer suggested, while stressing it’s only a hypothesis, that during the long run in gold many traders did ultra-fast scalping, taking advantage of the lack of a minimum holding time.

But the lesson is clear.

When a prop changes the rules mid-game, it’s usually telling you one thing only: the numbers don’t add up anymore.

4. The ones that vanish in silence

And then there are those who don’t even say goodbye.

FundsCap, forex and CFD prop: today the website only shows a notice of permanent cessation of activities. No date, no reason, no published plan for accounts and payouts.

Limitless Funding: the domain no longer hosts the company and redirects elsewhere. No announcement.

Bespoke Funding Program (United Kingdom): according to the UK companies register, it was dissolved via voluntary strike-off on 4 August 2026. On 31/10/2023 the FCA had put it on its Warning List as an unauthorised firm that may be targeting customers in the UK. No refund plan found.

For completeness: on 16 September Redline Futures was showing purchases closed. It’s not a confirmed closure, but it’s exactly the kind of signal we talk about further down.

On the other side there are closures done properly, and they deserve credit.

Vault Funder (South Africa, Vault Markets group) closed at the end of July: on its official page it promises a full refund of challenges and funded accounts and payment of profits not yet withdrawn. ForFX closed in June, stating that fees were refunded and profits paid. In both cases the source is the company itself.

Closing is fine. Vanishing isn’t.

The summary

Prop firm When What happened For traders (according to sources)
FundedSeat (futures) announced 28/09/2026 Closes citing the limits of the big platforms. About $700k in monthly payouts claimed Active accounts refunded, pending withdrawals and positive live balances paid
FundsCap (forex/CFD) notice seen in September 2026 Website replaced by a cessation notice, with no date or reason No published plan
Limitless Funding autumn 2026 Domain redirecting elsewhere, no announcement Unknown
Rev One Trading (futures) mid-August 2026 Without a top-tier platform, the founder moves to prediction markets No statement on subscriptions and payouts
Bespoke Funding Program (UK) 04/08/2026 Company dissolved via voluntary strike-off No refund plan found
Vault Funder (South Africa) end of July 2026 Model declared no longer viable Full refunds and profits promised by the company
ATFunded (ATFX) 06/06/2026 Pause to evaluate alternative models Refunds promised, no public confirmation
ForFX June 2026 Permanent closure Fees refunded and profits paid, according to the company
OANDA Prop Trader 31/03/2026 Program closed after FTMO’s acquisition of OANDA Migration to FTMO with incentives, or refunds
Seacrest (formerly MyFundedFX) 06/02/2026 Closes CFD prop, focuses on brokerage Refunds on request and final payouts, to be requested by 28/02
FundingTicks (futures) 19/01/2026 Tougher rules in December, then closure as a “strategic decision” Refunds and payouts promised

What’s different compared to 2024

If you were around, you remember.

In 2024 the earthquake came from outside: in February, according to reports, MetaQuotes pushed brokers to cut MetaTrader access for props with US customers, and in the same month Eightcap, according to several props, announced it was ending its relationships with prop partners. Even before that, in August 2023, the CFTC had MyForexFunds’ assets frozen.

On MyForexFunds, a clarification, because you hear all sorts of things: in May 2025 the federal court in New Jersey dismissed the case with prejudice as a sanction for the CFTC’s misconduct during the proceedings. The case was dismissed without any ruling on the merits: neither a conviction nor an acquittal. (In September 2026 it was made public that the brand had been sold to a Dubai company.)

According to Finance Magnates Intelligence, between 80 and 100 prop firms may have disappeared in 2024 alone.

In 2026, on the other hand, the blow doesn’t come from a regulator.

It comes from inside:

  • access to platforms, especially in futures;
  • sustainability of the “challenges fund the payouts” model;
  • uncovered risk when the market makes a long, clean move.

Quieter. And in some ways more dangerous, because it doesn’t make the news until it’s too late.

Who’s growing instead, and why

While the others close, some are shifting up a gear.

FTMO in September 2026 distributed over 14.4 million dollars in rewards across about 7,100 payouts, with an average of around 2,000 dollars. It claims over 4.5 million registered traders and over 650 million paid out in total (figures released by the company, not certified, reported by Finance Magnates). And in the meantime it bought itself a broker.

Vest Labs, New York, raised 13 million dollars in a seed round led by Portal Ventures. Venture capital in props is a rarity, and their model is different: no simulated evaluations to sell, qualified traders trade perpetual futures with the company’s capital.

In July the Financial Commission launched a voluntary certification for prop firms: clear rules, consistent enforcement, transparent payouts, risk management and access to independent dispute resolution. Careful: it’s self-regulation, not a license. But it’s a step.

The common thread?

Reserves, scale, their own infrastructure. Or a model that doesn’t depend on the next customer buying a challenge.

It’s like Formula 1: the teams that build their engine in-house survive the bad seasons. The ones that buy it from someone else, at some point, end up stranded.

The checklist before buying a challenge

Here comes the part you really need.

Before giving your money to a prop, run through these checks. It takes ten minutes.

1. Are payouts slowing down?

Longer waiting times, more and more frequent “additional checks”. It’s the first symptom, almost always.

2. Have the rules been changed after the fact?

If a prop is accused of changing rules on accounts that were already open, there’s a risk it’ll do it again. The FundingTicks case says it all.

3. Who does it depend on?

A single platform, a single broker, a single data provider. If they pull the plug, what happens to your account?

4. What do the reviews from the last 60 days say?

Not the average score from three years ago. The last few weeks. A sudden drop in the score is an alarm bell.

5. How young is it?

Under 18 months old, it hasn’t been through a real bad cycle yet. It’s not a deal-breaker, it’s one more risk to weigh.

6. Are there signs of desperate “sales”?

Constant, ever more aggressive discounts, purchases suspended with no explanation. Sometimes it’s marketing. Sometimes it’s cash they need right now.

7. Are you protecting yourself?

Withdraw every cycle you can, don’t leave profits sleeping in the account to “let them grow”.

And spread it out: better two or three solid props than everything on just one.

Easy, right?

And yet most of the traders I’ve seen left holding the bag had skipped at least three of these points. Because they were in a rush. Because of the deal of the day.

Where the industry is heading

Props won’t disappear.

They did something important: they opened up trading to people who didn’t have the capital. That stays.

But the “sell challenges and hope the numbers add up” model is reaching the end of its cycle. What’s left are companies with real reserves, their own technology, clear rules that don’t change halfway through.

And around them, different paths are emerging: those who fund traders with real capital, those who certify, those who measure and rank performance instead of selling exams to pass, those looking at prediction markets.

It’s also why, after years inside this world, with The Thunder Trader I chose a different path: the Performance Arena, an environment where you measure yourself on a public leaderboard, with a reward scheme defined before you start. Not to replace props, but because I believe in a different model.

Just performance.

For everything else, the rule is always the same: before you buy, look under the hood.

If you found this article useful, share it with a trader friend who’s about to buy their next challenge. It costs you nothing, and it might save them a nasty wake-up call.

Suerte Amigo!

Tiziano Brunno

Tradingblog

When a prop firm changes the rules mid-game, it is usually telling you the numbers no longer add up. Withdraw every cycle.

— tradingblog.itPosta su X

Want to put your market reading to the test?

Measure yourself against other traders inside an Arena in a demo environment, with no real capital at risk. Discover the Performance Arena Events by The Thunder Trader.

Discover The Thunder Trader →

Sources

Disclaimer: purely informational and educational content. It does not constitute financial advice or an invitation to trade. Trading involves the risk of capital loss. Information on the firms mentioned is current as of 23/10/2026 and comes from the sources listed.

← Torna al blog
The hours that matter on futures (and the week New York opens an hour early... A large station clock with its face lit in amber, under an iron and glass canopy, at night, above the empty tracks.
© 2026 tradingblog.it — Tiziano BrunnoContenuti a scopo informativo e didattico, NON consulenza finanziaria. Il trading comporta un rischio elevato di perdita del capitale.